Welcome to Andrew Greeley's Web
Author, Priest, Poet

Sept 5th 2007 - True or false: Can Bush tell difference?

True or false:
Can Bush tell difference?

September 5th, 2007

in the Chicago SunTimes' Daily Southtown
By Andrew Greeley

nav1.gif (1982 bytes)
Articles
nav2.gif (583 bytes)
Leave Messages
nav3.gif (528 bytes)
About the Author
nav4.gif (545 bytes)
Homilies
nav5.gif (654 bytes)
Preview Novels
nav6.gif (644 bytes)
Mailbox Newsletters
nav7.gif (669 bytes)
Home
nav8.gif (801 bytes)

  Is President Bush able to distinguish truth from falsehood? Is he too caught up in the double-talk generated by his spin masters to grasp the difference? After reading his talk to the VFW last week, I think that at this stage of his presidency he is utterly incapable of honest communication with the rest of the country.

 Objectively, his claim that the United States can win in Iraq, his comment that the Iraqi prime minister is a good guy and his history of the Vietnam War go far beyond the boundaries of truth. Granted, the speech was ground out by one of the spin masters (perhaps trained in dishonesty by Karl Rove), the president ultimately is responsible for it. It follows logically from all the falsehoods going back to weapons of mass destruction. It is contradicted by the intelligence estimate released the same day by the director of National Intelligence. The killing continues, the Iraq government is not improving, the war continues.

  And, one would add, Americans continue to die.

  Why does the president continue to deny the obvious, even when his own intelligence agency affirms it? Because some conservatives insist the United States could have won the Vietnam War if it hadn't ''lost its nerve''? There is no serious support for this folklore. The only similarity is both wars were foolish wars for which there was no good reason, the United States was doomed to defeat from the beginning, and if someone had not pulled the plug, we'd still be fighting in Vietnam, just as we are still fighting -- perhaps forever -- in Iraq.

  The Iraq Study Group gave the president a way out. He didn't take it because he wanted victory. He can't have victory. But he is not quitting during his administration, no matter how many more senseless deaths occur. His VFW speech is part of a campaign to elect a president who will continue the war. Whether Bush is deliberately deceiving his potential supporters or whether he no longer knows truth from falsehood because of his personality traits must remain a question only God can answer.

_

Keep in touch...
Locally, and Globally! 
Read On
Check out
Andrew M. Greeley's Columns for the
Chicago SunTimes'
Daily Southtown
.
_

00spc.gif (820 bytes)
  However, it is not wrong to question his credibility -- and the suffering it causes to the families of those who die because of his stubborn insistence on ''staying the course'' until a democratic Iraq becomes a reality. Must we not say, Mr. President, you have spoken so often against the truth, that we no longer believe anything you say.

  Some writers tell me I am driven by hatred of the president, and as a priest I ought not to hate anyone. (These are people who generally did not think it was wrong to hate President Clinton or President Kennedy). I don't hate the president, but I hate this stupid, unjust and evil war. To be a priest and not condemn evil would be sinful.

  The war will end only when it ends, when someone in power says, "already, all right, enough," and announces that the war is over. Lyndon Johnson tried to do that when he withdrew from the 1968 election. The Iraq Study Group tried to do the same thing. Johnson's plan was frustrated when Richard M. Nixon won the election and continued the war for six more years (during which time more people died than had in the previous six years). The Iraq Study Group, basically conservative men, ran afoul of the president's stubbornness and the reluctant loyalty of his congress- ional allies.

  The long-awaited reports of Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker will provide another escape hatch. They will have to report in some way the Iraq government is not able to end the raging civil war. Does anyone want to bet the president will say, ''Then, let's get out of there''?

.Securely purchase Andrew Greeley's New book - click here!

Read Father Greeley's latest Articles: 
dot.gif (44 bytes) Saddam execution is stain on America   dot.gif (44 bytes) A church 'scandal' that isn't.
dot.gif (44 bytes)
Suddenly, greed doesn't look good         dot.gif (44 bytes) Bush's cloak-and-stagger folly.
dot.gif (44 bytes)
Bumbling CIA's failures hurt America      dot.gif (44 bytes) Will we betray our Iraqi workers?
dot.gif (44 bytes) Better bishops would be a blessing        dot.gif (44 bytes) Immigration 'win' is no victory
dot.gif (44 bytes)
Caution made JFK a great leader           dot.gif (44 bytes) Ethnic biases stronger than ever           
dot.gif (44 bytes) Latest Bush Iraq plan will fail                 dot.gif (44 bytes) An ending with no meaning
dot.gif (44 bytes)
Long war' plan short on substance         dot.gif (44 bytes) Hatred of immigrants is sinful
dot.gif (44 bytes)
Irrational attacks on immigration            dot.gif (44 bytes) History lesson on whom to trust

Read the Chicago SunTimes' Daily Southtown articles.

Contact Father Greeley

More New Articles

Rapture
Articles | Messages | Author | Homilies | Previews | Mailbox Newsletters | Home

 

Andrew M. Greeley © 1995-'07
All Rights Reserved
Questions & Comments: Webmaster